Employer · Arizona

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District

Name: Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tucson, AZ · ~53 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.8
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District: 0.8 TCR = 23% of industry BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District safety composite

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District held a steady TCR band

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #10/82
PHOTO San Joaquin County I…
BOOK 6y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Joaquin County Information Services Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.8
San Joaquin Co

0.8
Village of Bir

0.8
Rowan County P

0.8
City Center

0.8

What this shows Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District falls in its industry

1,496 industry establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 82 industry employers in Arizona.

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District (53 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Fc2 - Regional Flood Control District has fewer employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	0.0	0.0	0
2022	0.0	0.0	0
2020	2.3	2.3	1
2019	2.2	2.2	1
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · AZ · Tucson

1,496 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	San Joaquin County Information Services Department	STOCKTON, CA	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Village of Birch Run	BIRCH RUN, MI	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Rowan County Public Health Department	SALISBURY, NC	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City Center	HUTCHINSON, MN	0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	RAH Phoenix Division Office/Home Gallery	SCOTTSDALE	53 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MT Builders	SCOTTSDALE	53 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Loven Contracting Inc	FLAGSTAFF	53 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Northwest Construction	TUCSON	53 FTE
CITY-NEAR	University of Arizona	Tucson	18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site	Tucson	9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tucson Medical Center	Tucson	4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR	U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson	Tucson	3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR	District 9 - Itasca County	Grand Rapids, MN	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	0d28 - W Pittsburgh Pa Fas	Bridgeville, PA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Ryerson - Pounding Mill	Pounding Mill, VA	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	MPK281	Menlo Park, CA	0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Smith Fertilizer & Grain Co	Knoxville, IA	53 FTE
NAT-SIZE	NorthState - 40	Palo Cedro, CA	53 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Chamberlain Machine LLC	Walpole, NH	53 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Wimmer Corporate	Hales Corners, WI	53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.