Truck trailer manufacturing · Minnesota

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre

Sauk Centre, MN · ~227 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Truck trailer manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre: 4.5 TCR = 135% of Truck trailer manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre safety composite

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2018→2024

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre injury rate improved

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre's TCR fell 2.8 from 7.0 in 2018 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.0 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336212 · Sauk Centre, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #6/15
  • PHOTO M.H. Eby, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~227 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M.H. Eby, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre averages 4.5 TCR (135% of the Truck trailer manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre TCR series: 2018=7 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre falls in its industry

474 Truck trailer manufacturing establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 15 Truck trailer manufacturing employers in Minnesota.

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre (227 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre
Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre (227 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Felling Trailers, Inc. - Sauk Centre has more employees than the Truck trailer manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 2.9 8 2 0
2023 4.0 1.3 7 2 0
2022 3.5 0.5 6 1 0
2021 1.9 1.9 4 0 0
2020 6.2 3.4 10 3 0
2019 4.4 2.7 9 1 0
2018 7.0 2.8 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336212 · MN · Sauk Centre

474 Truck trailer manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 23 employers in Sauk Centre, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M.H. Eby, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vanguard National Trailer Trenton GA 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caldwell Plant 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vermeer VM Solutions 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greatbatch - Minneapolis 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE Park Industries Inc - 6301 Building 227 FTE
STATE-SIZE S.J. Electro Systems, Inc 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4253 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR CentraCare - Sauk Centre 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4253 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sauk Centre Public Schools 233 FTE
NAT-TCR Moss Landing Power Company LLC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Klamath Falls 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 202 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Cooper University Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cook Vandergrift Inc. 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bossier City 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hayes Performance Systems 227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Excel Truck Group Roanoke 227 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.