Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors · California

Fenix Marine Services

Terminal Island, CA · ~2,152 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fenix Marine Services runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors workplace, earning a grade B.

Fenix Marine Services: 3.3 TCR = 73% of Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fenix Marine Services safety composite

Fenix Marine Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fenix Marine Services: 2.4 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

Fenix Marine Services's TCR rose 1.8 from 2.4 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488320 · Terminal Island, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #20/65
  • PHOTO SSA Pacific Stockton
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 234 inj
  • SIZE ~2,152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSA Pacific Stockton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fenix Marine Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fenix Marine Services averages 3.3 TCR (73% of the Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fenix Marine Services TCR series: 2018=2.4 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Fenix Marine Services falls in its industry

391 Loading and unloading services establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 65 Loading and unloading services employers in California.

Fenix Marine Services (2,152 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fenix Marine Services
Fenix Marine Services (2,152 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Fenix Marine Services has more employees than the Loading and unloading services at ports median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 2.0 25 27 0
2023 4.7 2.5 31 26 0
2022 2.6 2.3 36 1 0
2021 2.6 1.9 39 1 0
2020 3.4 2.4 33 8 0
2019 3.2 1.7 33 14 1
2018 2.4 2.1 37 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488320 · CA · Terminal Island

391 Loading and unloading services at ports and harbors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 5 employers in Terminal Island, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SSA Pacific Stockton 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ceres Tampa 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR WCTSLB 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Stevedoring Services 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE N. Gonzalez Farm Labor 2,143 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 41 2,161 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 50 2,161 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 36 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 461 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eagle Marine Services 1,913 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardagh Metal Packaging USA, Inc. - Terminal Island 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR APM Terminals 4 FTE
NAT-TCR Cargill Protein Dodge City 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Denali Princess Wilderness Lodge 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SpillTech 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Globe Trailer Manufacturing, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Phoenix B10 Fire Dept 2,152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Washington Hospital 2,152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safe Haven Security Services LLC 2,153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group 2,151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.