Anodizing equipment manufacturing · Michigan

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.

Fenton, MI · ~242 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Anodizing equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Anodizing equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. safety composite

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. held a steady TCR band

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.'s TCR held near 0.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Fenton, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #8/42
  • PHOTO Stratasys SDM (Belton)
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stratasys SDM (Belton) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Anodizing equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. falls in its industry

448 Anodizing equipment manufactur establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 42 Anodizing equipment manufactur employers in Michigan.

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. (242 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.
Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. (242 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Fenton - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. has more employees than the Anodizing equipment manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.2 0.6 2 0 0
2020 2.2 0.6 4 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2018 2.7 0.6 4 1 0
2017 1.7 0.4 4 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Fenton

448 Anodizing equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 46 employers in Fenton, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stratasys SDM (Belton) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawson Screen Products, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Technologies Group (ITG) : Steelastic 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters-Bensalem 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Champion Foods 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Intertape Polymer Group 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duo-Form Plastics 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huhtamaki Coleman Operations 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2693 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burgaflex North America 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2693 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kelsey-Hayes Company-Fenton 252 FTE
NAT-TCR Americas Resins and Global FM : Springfield 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jordanelle Special Service District 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Company Kingman 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Entergy Labadieville 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martin Training & Staffing Solutions 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanging H Companies LLC 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE MultiCare Behavioral Health (Company 41) 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastview Elementary 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.