Noncellulosic staple fibers and filaments manufacturing · Georgia

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company

Covington, GA · ~237 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Noncellulosic staple fibers and filaments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company: 1.2 TCR = 37% of Noncellulosic staple fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company safety composite

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2018

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company injury rate improved

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325220 · Covington, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #2/12
  • PHOTO Lenzing Fibers Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lenzing Fibers Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FiberVisions Manufacturing Company averages 1.2 TCR (37% of the Noncellulosic staple fibers and filaments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where FiberVisions Manufacturing Company falls in its industry

68 Noncellulosic staple fibers an establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 12 Noncellulosic staple fibers an employers in Georgia.

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company (237 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate FiberVisions Manufacturing Company
FiberVisions Manufacturing Company (237 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 167 employees and a TCR of 2.0

FiberVisions Manufacturing Company has more employees than the Noncellulosic staple fibers and filament median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.1 0.8 3 0 0
2017 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2016 1.8 0.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325220 · GA · Covington

68 Noncellulosic staple fibers and filaments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 91 employers in Covington, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lenzing Fibers Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hexcel-Decatur 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Processing Corp 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Propex Chattanooga 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ReaderLink Southeastern Distribution Center 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry Rome 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant D4 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 7194 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD Covington GA 840 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Newton Hospital 679 FTE
CITY-NEAR C.R. Bard COV Non-Ops 664 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice : COVINGTON 447 FTE
NAT-TCR BioScrip Infusion Services - Tampa - 2310 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Us Inside Sales - Phoenix (Azs51) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR San Marcos Operations 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holland - MS 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Allen (Lapor) 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pontiac (Mipon) 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Performance Lester - 0685 237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.