General warehousing and storage · Tennessee

Fidelitone - Elizabethton

Elizabethton, TN · ~77 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fidelitone - Elizabethton runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Fidelitone - Elizabethton: 1.6 TCR = 28% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fidelitone - Elizabethton safety composite

Fidelitone - Elizabethton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Fidelitone - Elizabethton injury rate improved

Fidelitone - Elizabethton's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Elizabethton, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #94/297
  • PHOTO US08 Underwood Link…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: US08 Underwood Link Snacks Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Fidelitone - Elizabethton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fidelitone - Elizabethton averages 1.6 TCR (28% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fidelitone - Elizabethton TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Fidelitone - Elizabethton falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 297 General warehousing and storag employers in Tennessee.

Fidelitone - Elizabethton (77 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fidelitone - Elizabethton
Fidelitone - Elizabethton (77 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fidelitone - Elizabethton has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2017 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2016 4.6 4.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TN · Elizabethton

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 30 employers in Elizabethton, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR US08 Underwood Link Snacks Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA NC Statesville Piedmont DSC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4198 Eagle Hill Road High Point NC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Desoto - 2020 North Polk Street 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bristol Tennessee Essential Services 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Foundation Specialists 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porter Roofing Contractors Morrison, TN 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid South Industrial, Inc. 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snap-on Tools Elizabethton 441 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 690 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR 690 359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sycamore Shoals Hospital 337 FTE
NAT-TCR Martik Brothers Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cornerstone Masonry, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR El Paso Home Care 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Adamo Demolition Co. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Highland Homes Austin, LLC. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Thrift - Daytona 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birch Grove Elementary School 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miesc - Escanaba 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.