Motor & Generator Manufacturing · Maryland

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems

Sparks, MD · ~142 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor & Generator Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Motor & Generator Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems safety composite

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems: 1.5 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems's TCR rose 0.5 from 1.5 in 2022 to 2.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Sparks, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK P63
  • PHOTO Gerome Technologies
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gerome Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Motor & Generator Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems TCR series: 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems falls in its industry

222 Motor & Generator Manufacturin establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems (142 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems
Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems (142 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Fidelity Engineering, LLC dba Fidelity Power Systems has more employees than the Motor & Generator Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.7 3 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 1 1 0
2022 1.5 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · MD · Sparks

222 Motor & Generator Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 22 employers in Sparks, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gerome Technologies 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windings, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DC - Rochester Hills, MI 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pump and Motor Works Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Electromet Corporation 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Burch 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safeware Inc. 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jones Toyota 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Becton Dickinson Integrated Diagnostic Solutions Baltimore 2,376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems Baltimore 2,281 FTE
CITY-NEAR HUNT VALLEY (MDHUN) 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDHUN - HUNT VALLEY 539 FTE
NAT-TCR Automated Packaging Systems LLC of Sealed Air 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lins Richfield 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oertel Metal Works, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2018 - CA California Health Care Facility - Stockton 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Roofing and Sheet Metal 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complete Care Brackenville 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bobcat Electrical & Instrumentation LLC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE GROFF 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.