Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Fillmore Country Club

Fillmore, CA · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fillmore Country Club runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Fillmore Country Club: 1.6 TCR = 41% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fillmore Country Club safety composite

Fillmore Country Club scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fillmore Country Club held a steady TCR band

Fillmore Country Club's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fillmore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/635
  • PHOTO The Phoenix at Opelika
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Phoenix at Opelika (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fillmore Country Club in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fillmore Country Club averages 1.6 TCR (41% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fillmore Country Club TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Fillmore Country Club falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Fillmore Country Club (28 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fillmore Country Club
Fillmore Country Club (28 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fillmore Country Club has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fillmore

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Fillmore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Phoenix at Opelika 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Place 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aurora Pond 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meridian at Ocean Villa 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 459 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 259 2,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR Villa Park Fillmore 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenfield Care Center of Fillmore 110 FTE
NAT-TCR KB Home Jacksonville LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Gartner Equipment Co. Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 620 - North San Antonio Branch 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeywell - Geneva 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concannon Paper 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titus - Humboldt 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Construction Company 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel City Tire LLC 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.