Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables · California

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon

Piru, CA · ~93 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables workplace, earning a grade A.

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon: 2.2 TCR = 48% of Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon safety composite

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2019

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon injury rate improved

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Piru, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/236
  • PHOTO 2065-Farmer City, IL…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2065-Farmer City, IL (Monsanto Co.) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon averages 2.2 TCR (48% of the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon TCR series: 2017=4 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon falls in its industry

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 236 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an employers in California.

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon (93 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon
Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon (93 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Fillmore Piru Citrus Associateon has more employees than the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 0.8 2 1 0
2017 4.0 1.0 1 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Piru

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Piru, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2065-Farmer City, IL (Monsanto Co.) 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silver Creek & Seamans Orchard, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wynne Division 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer HI-BRED INTL INC, Constantine MI 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. View Farming, Inc. 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE PAC-MAN 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE E A & T 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mountain Meadow Mushroom Farms, Inc. 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR La Verne Nursery, Inc. 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piru 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fillmore Piru Citrus Association 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR organic berries 33 FTE
NAT-TCR Belleville, MI 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Disposal - Mobile Hauling 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Moser's Foods #5 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacksonville Plant 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omnova Solutions - Mogadore, Ohio Site 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Disposal - Melrose Park Hauling 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Disposal - Waukegan Hauling 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dunford Bakers, Inc 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.