All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing · Colorado

Filtration : Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Filtration : Colorado Springs runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Filtration : Colorado Springs: 0.0 TCR = 0% of All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Filtration : Colorado Springs safety composite

Filtration : Colorado Springs scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Filtration : Colorado Springs held a steady TCR band

Filtration : Colorado Springs's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/12
  • PHOTO Ultra Clean Technolo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ultra Clean Technology - Chandler (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Filtration : Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Filtration : Colorado Springs averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Filtration : Colorado Springs TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Filtration : Colorado Springs falls in its industry

827 All Other Miscellaneous Fabric establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 12 All Other Miscellaneous Fabric employers in Colorado.

Filtration : Colorado Springs (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Filtration : Colorado Springs
Filtration : Colorado Springs (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Filtration : Colorado Springs has fewer employees than the All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · CO · Colorado Springs

827 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ultra Clean Technology - Chandler 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR OPW FCC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EthosEnergy TC, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filtration : Greensboro AFD 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FORT COLLINS GLOBAL BARLEY RESEARCH 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Good Chemistry - Jefe 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Welby Westwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Front Range Farms, LLC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Filtration : Ottawa 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baxter Brewing Co LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAP Barbell Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spiral Brushes, Inc. 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.