Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Alabama

Final Mile BHAM AL

Birmingham, AL · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Final Mile BHAM AL runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade A.

Final Mile BHAM AL: 1.7 TCR = 26% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Final Mile BHAM AL safety composite

Final Mile BHAM AL scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2017→2019

Final Mile BHAM AL injury rate improved

Final Mile BHAM AL's TCR fell 5.2 from 5.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Birmingham, AL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/100
  • PHOTO SER
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Final Mile BHAM AL in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Final Mile BHAM AL averages 1.7 TCR (26% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Final Mile BHAM AL TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Final Mile BHAM AL falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 100 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Alabama.

Final Mile BHAM AL (23 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Final Mile BHAM AL
Final Mile BHAM AL (23 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Final Mile BHAM AL has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.2 5.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · AL · Birmingham

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SER 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 4929 HARBOR DRIVE 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Counties Courier - San Diego 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - RDU5 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Geraldine Breeder/Broilers 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ashland Breeder and Broiler 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Central Alabama Generating Station 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR Earle M. Jorgensen Company Chicago 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WA-Boeing (Everett) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IN - Public/Philip Morris 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #811 SUGAR HILL, GA 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ODW - Sacramento 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grandy's Store #187 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Denny's Store #316 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wendy's Store #346 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.