Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · California

Final Mile Deliverables

Chula Vista, CA · ~83 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Final Mile Deliverables runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade F.

Final Mile Deliverables: 21.0 TCR = 324% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Final Mile Deliverables safety composite

Final Mile Deliverables scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Final Mile Deliverables: 20.0 → 31.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 31.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

Final Mile Deliverables's TCR rose 11.0 from 20.0 in 2020 to 31.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Chula Vista, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.0 · 324% of ind

  • DART 31.0 DART
  • RANK #640/710
  • PHOTO WAELL - ELLENSBURG
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WAELL - ELLENSBURG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Final Mile Deliverables in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Final Mile Deliverables averages 21.0 TCR (324% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Final Mile Deliverables TCR series: 2020=20 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=23 · 2023=17 · 2024=31 · BLS 6.5

Where Final Mile Deliverables falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #640 safest of 710 Local letter and parcel delive employers in California.

Final Mile Deliverables (83 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Final Mile Deliverables
Final Mile Deliverables (83 employees, TCR 21.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Final Mile Deliverables has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 31.0 31.0 17 0 0
2023 17.0 17.0 12 0 0
2022 23.0 23.0 15 0 0
2021 14.2 14.2 8 0 0
2020 20.0 20.0 10 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Chula Vista

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 219 employers in Chula Vista, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WAELL - ELLENSBURG 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DARTS Delivery Services 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 331860000 21.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orion Logistics LLC 21.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Slope Trees 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Grangeville) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Stratford Shop) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Lemoore Shop) 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chula Vista Medical Center - 751 Medical Center Court 2,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sharp Chula Vista Medical Ctr 2,094 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr Inc a UTC Aerospace Systems Company 1,957 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rohr, Inc. (Chula Vista CA) 1,457 FTE
NAT-TCR Kratz Enterprises 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lombard Architectural Precast Products Company 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1223 Swn1000 21.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CentraCare - Chateau Waters 21.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orange City 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zwick Construction Company 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jasper Weller, LLC - DBA Weller Truck Parts (Grandville) 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northampton 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.