General accounting offices, government · Connecticut

Financial Services

West Hartford, CT · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Financial Services runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General accounting offices, government workplace, earning a grade A.

Financial Services: 1.1 TCR = 33% of General accounting offices, government BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Financial Services safety composite

Financial Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2016→2024

Financial Services injury rate improved

Financial Services's TCR fell 9.5 from 9.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · West Hartford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/124
  • PHOTO County Administration
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: County Administration (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Financial Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Financial Services averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the General accounting offices, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Financial Services TCR series: 2016=9.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Financial Services falls in its industry

1,496 General accounting offices, go establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 124 General accounting offices, go employers in Connecticut.

Financial Services (23 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Financial Services
Financial Services (23 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Financial Services has fewer employees than the General accounting offices, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.5 9.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CT · West Hartford

1,496 General accounting offices, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 118 employers in West Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR County Administration 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ELECT-ELECTIONS 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Hoyt Lakes - General 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Phoenix B50 Auditor 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE InnoConn Construction Management LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE OWI Contractors, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Ansaldi Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cocchiola Paving Inc 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Triumph Group 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand Wiremold West Hartford 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hebrew Center for Health and Rehabilitation 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colt's Manufacturing Company LLC 425 FTE
NAT-TCR FSC - Front Street 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Missouri Rural Electric Cooperative 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Howard Concrete Pumping Company 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Harvard Maintenance Inc of Oklahoma 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mold-Tech Midwest 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE K&L Feeds 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 110 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Mills 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.