Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Wisconsin

First Team Logistics

Madison, WI · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

First Team Logistics runs at 338% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

First Team Logistics: 22.0 TCR = 338% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

First Team Logistics safety composite

First Team Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−23.3

2022→2024

First Team Logistics injury rate improved

First Team Logistics's TCR fell 23.3 from 52.7 in 2022 to 29.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 52.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=52.7 · 2023=14.6 · 2024=29.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Madison, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.0 · 338% of ind

  • DART 22.1 DART
  • RANK #108/113
  • PHOTO Riman Logistics, LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Riman Logistics, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

First Team Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows First Team Logistics averages 22.0 TCR (338% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

First Team Logistics TCR series: 2022=52.7 · 2023=14.6 · 2024=29.4 · BLS 6.5

Where First Team Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 113 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Wisconsin.

First Team Logistics (47 employees, TCR 22.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate First Team Logistics
First Team Logistics (47 employees, TCR 22.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

First Team Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 29.4 22.1 12 0 0
2023 14.6 14.6 6 0 0
2022 52.7 52.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · WI · Madison

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 577 employers in Madison, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Riman Logistics, LLC 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 389 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Denver Last Mile Logistics, LLC 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEXARKANA (ARTEX) 22.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Calf Source, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE URUS Distribution Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Bend Service Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Contract Operations, Inc. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary's Hospital - Madison 2,401 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meriter Hospital 2,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR EatStreet 1,659 FTE
CITY-NEAR TDS - Junction Road (All Employees) 1,302 FTE
NAT-TCR Pleasant Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Healthcare Center 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Region : Aeu 22.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hpstc - Tcc 22.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wells Rural Electric Co 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE I Auman Machine Co Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premium Hardwoods, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seville,OH - 306 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.