Online access service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure · New Hampshire

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth

Portsmouth, NH · ~78 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Online access service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure workplace, earning a grade C.

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Online access service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth safety composite

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

84/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth held a steady TCR band

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.0 TCR.

2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Portsmouth, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/6
  • PHOTO TXC101551
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXC101551 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Online access service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth falls in its industry

455 Online access service provider establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 6 Online access service provider employers in New Hampshire.

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth (78 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth
FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth (78 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

FirstLight Fiber - Portsmouth has fewer employees than the Online access service providers, using o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · NH · Portsmouth

455 Online access service providers, using own operated wired telecommunications infrastructure employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 119 employers in Portsmouth, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA20185 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MD05119 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VAAASHVA 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kluber Lubrication NA LP (NH1) 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Freudenberg NOK Sealing technologies - Ashland 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manchester 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-000003533 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lonza Portsmouth 1,182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Portsmouth Regional Hospital 1,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-DTSV 339 FTE
CITY-NEAR LDRM Visa Support Services NVC-LWH 330 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogers Group, Inc 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Von Tobel Corporation- Valparaiso 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Reserve at Spring Hill 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anaconda Foundry Fabrication Co. Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breda Company, Inc. Austin 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.