Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Kentucky

Fischbach Kentucky

Elizabethtown, KY · ~150 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fischbach Kentucky runs at 253% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Fischbach Kentucky: 8.3 TCR = 253% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fischbach Kentucky safety composite

Fischbach Kentucky scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fischbach Kentucky held a steady TCR band

Fischbach Kentucky's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.3 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 43.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.3 · 2017=43.9 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Elizabethtown, KY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 253% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #55/59
  • PHOTO DAPA Products, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~150 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAPA Products, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Fischbach Kentucky in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fischbach Kentucky averages 8.3 TCR (253% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fischbach Kentucky TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=43.9 · 2018=4.6 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Fischbach Kentucky falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 59 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Kentucky.

Fischbach Kentucky (150 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fischbach Kentucky
Fischbach Kentucky (150 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fischbach Kentucky has more employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.5 9 0 0
2023 2.2 1.7 3 1 0
2022 3.2 1.3 3 2 0
2021 5.2 3.7 7 0 0
2020 3.9 2.6 6 0 0
2019 3.9 2.6 6 0 0
2018 4.6 2.6 7 0 0
2017 43.9 19.5 8 1 0
2016 4.3 3.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · KY · Elizabethtown

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 130 employers in Elizabethtown, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAPA Products, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zephyrhills 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monoflo International Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mauser USA LLC-IBC 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE EGC Construction Corp 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE PMW - Preston 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrier Vibrating Equipment Inc. 150 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meyer Tool Cox Plant 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hardin Memorial Hospital 2,311 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health Hardin 2,058 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metalsa 1,807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Etown 956 FTE
NAT-TCR Dvj- Vi Jon 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RR79 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 022-OSH 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Cambridge Homes 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Londonderry Production Center 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rock Road Companies, Inc. 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sewell Products of Florida, LLC 150 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unitex 155 Mount Vernon 150 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.