Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Texas

Fischbach Texas

Farmers Branch, TX · ~36 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fischbach Texas runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Fischbach Texas: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fischbach Texas safety composite

Fischbach Texas scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2020

Fischbach Texas injury rate improved

Fischbach Texas's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Farmers Branch, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/161
  • PHOTO Carclo Technical Pla…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carclo Technical Plastics- Derry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fischbach Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fischbach Texas averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fischbach Texas TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Fischbach Texas falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 161 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Texas.

Fischbach Texas (36 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fischbach Texas
Fischbach Texas (36 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fischbach Texas has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TX · Farmers Branch

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 94 employers in Farmers Branch, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carclo Technical Plastics- Derry 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR VPET USA LLC - ILLINOIS 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signode Industrial Group 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reidsville Operations 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE FRONTIER FEED YARD 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paco Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coyote Lake Feedyard Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Waelder 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4818-48180056-2001 DIPLOMAT DR-WC 1,065 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4818-TX02 920 FTE
CITY-NEAR JMEG, LLC - DFW 906 FTE
CITY-NEAR CING10037820 701 FTE
NAT-TCR Baker Shindler Contracting Co., Inc. - Defiance 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Huntsville at the Space & Rocket Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Electrical Contractors, Inc. (Columbia Tech) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Thoma-Sea Marine Contructors Repair Yard 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE LQ7005 Milwaukee Bayshore Area 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runamok Maple 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiedmeyer Service Center 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn - Auburn 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.