Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing · Maine

Fisher Engineering

Rockland, ME · ~348 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Fisher Engineering runs at 323% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
197
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Fisher Engineering's OSHA Total Case Rate of 10.7 to the Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (323% of benchmark) across 9 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Fisher Engineering's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

05101520 201620172018201920202021202220232024 7.93.3 Industry benchmarkFisher Engineering TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 333120.

Where Fisher Engineering falls in its industry

417 Snow plow attachments (except establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Trend analysis for Fisher Engineering

Between 2016 and 2024, Fisher Engineering's Total Case Rate worsened from 6.7 to 7.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 18% increase across 8 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 6.7, while 2021 saw the highest rate, at 16.7, a spread of 10.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 9 reporting years, Fisher Engineering recorded 197 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 9-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 197 injuries, 111 illnesses shown on this page for Fisher Engineering are sourced from its own 9 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333120 - Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

9 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 404,391 hours worked = 4.45 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Fisher Engineering (this establishment) 10.66 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 9-year avg
Construction machinery manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 333120
Maine state avg (all industries) 7.33 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Fisher Engineering to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 4.5 9 7 0
2023 10.0 5.8 21 10 0
2022 16.5 10.4 47 12 0
2021 16.7 11.0 33 23 0
2020 10.3 4.3 18 13 0
2019 8.2 3.8 16 12 0
2018 9.3 3.8 23 9 0
2017 10.4 2.5 17 16 0
2016 6.7 3.0 13 9 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Fisher Engineering's reported OSHA injury record versus its Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 323% of the Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing benchmark, Fisher Engineering reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Fisher Engineering's safety grade?
Fisher Engineering has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 10.7 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Snow plow attachments (except lawn, garden-type) manufacturing.
How many injuries has Fisher Engineering reported?
Fisher Engineering has reported 197 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 9 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Maine, and by nearby establishments in Rockland - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~10.7)

Similar size (~348 workers)

Nearby in Rockland

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.