Water tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log

Chester, PA · ~170 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Water tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log safety composite

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log injury rate improved

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.1 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · Chester, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #1/20
  • PHOTO D.B. Doran Copper & …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~170 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: D.B. Doran Copper & Iron Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Water tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=0.5 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log falls in its industry

355 Water tanks, heavy gauge metal establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 20 Water tanks, heavy gauge metal employers in Pennsylvania.

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log (170 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log
Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log (170 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Fisher Tank Company Corporate Log has more employees than the Water tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2018 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2017 2.1 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · PA · Chester

355 Water tanks, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 45 employers in Chester, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR D.B. Doran Copper & Iron Works 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ADA-ES, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Ass Tanks 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATEC 1 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HES Montgomery 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE CONSHOHOCKEN PA DEPOT 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE BRP 170 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrah's Philadelphia Casino Racetrack 1,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Access Network 941 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHRG PHL/HQ 826 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHRG HQ 680 FTE
NAT-TCR Corp-Denver 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St Albans 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PCL Industrial Services, Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wire Tech Ltd Summerville 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Merrill Farms LLC 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE MD&A Repairs 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camp Street 170 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Center 170 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.