Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Pennsylvania

Fitzmaurice Community Services

Stroudsburg, PA · ~280 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fitzmaurice Community Services runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

Fitzmaurice Community Services: 3.5 TCR = 91% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fitzmaurice Community Services safety composite

Fitzmaurice Community Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2022

Fitzmaurice Community Services injury rate improved

Fitzmaurice Community Services's TCR fell 0.8 from 3.3 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.7 · 2022=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Stroudsburg, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #36/121
  • PHOTO Horizon Home Timothy…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~280 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizon Home Timothy/Bethany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Fitzmaurice Community Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fitzmaurice Community Services averages 3.5 TCR (91% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fitzmaurice Community Services TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=4.7 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Fitzmaurice Community Services falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 121 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Pennsylvania.

Fitzmaurice Community Services (280 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fitzmaurice Community Services
Fitzmaurice Community Services (280 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Fitzmaurice Community Services has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 2.5 6 0 0
2019 4.7 2.0 14 0 0
2018 4.4 2.0 9 4 0
2017 2.4 0.4 5 1 0
2016 3.3 2.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · PA · Stroudsburg

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 40 employers in Stroudsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizon Home Timothy/Bethany 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arc of Iroquois County 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AUGLAIZE FACILITY 1 AUGLAIZE FACILITY 1 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rudolph Office 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ Claysburg 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koppel 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Giorgi Companies Inc. 280 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cabinetworks Group 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Monroe 625 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shop Rite of Stroudsburg 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pocono Produce Co., Inc. 227 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1260 - Stroudsburg 188 FTE
NAT-TCR EMJ co 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 407 - Wallingford 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 183 N Austin 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1027 - Florence-AL 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE GHB Distribution 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vortex Companies 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sweco 280 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cafna - Fontana 280 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.