Electric power generation, nuclear · New York

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Oswego, NY · ~586 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant: 0.1 TCR = 13% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant safety composite

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant held a steady TCR band

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221113 · Oswego, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P61
  • PHOTO Catawba Nuclear
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~586 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Catawba Nuclear (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant averages 0.1 TCR (13% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant falls in its industry

80 Electric power generation, nuc establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant (586 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0123 Average employees Total Case Rate Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant (586 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 669 employees and a TCR of 0.2

Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 0 5 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221113 · NY · Oswego

80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 46 employers in Oswego, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Catawba Nuclear 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR McGuire Nuclear 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterford 3 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH ANNA PWR STA 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CANARSIE SERVICE CENTER (NY43) 586 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease (US) Construction LMB Inc. 586 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sugar Foods Corporation Villa Rica 586 FTE
STATE-SIZE LAURELTON (NYSPR) 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novelis Oswego Works 1,162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novelis Corporation 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oswego Hospital 1,114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Auxiliary Services SUNY Oswego Inc 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Manda - Baton Rouge 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CB&I Storage Tank Solutions LLC. 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PEPCO- Edison Place 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SA Recycling, East Point 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ahead Human Resources 586 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hershey Lodge 586 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAE USA Inc. 586 FTE
NAT-SIZE Decatur West 586 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.