Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing · Wisconsin

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC

Fond Du Lac, WI · ~113 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC safety composite

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC injury rate improved

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC's TCR fell 1.2 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Fond Du Lac, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/33
  • PHOTO Horizontal Boring, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizontal Boring, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC falls in its industry

391 Sheet metal forming machines m establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 33 Sheet metal forming machines m employers in Wisconsin.

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC (113 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC
Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC (113 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Fives Giddings & Lewis, LLC has more employees than the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2022 3.3 0.8 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 1 1 0
2016 2.1 2.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · WI · Fond Du Lac

391 Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 134 employers in Fond Du Lac, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizontal Boring, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sharon Cutwell Co 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stolle Machinery - Canton 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bulldog Factory Service 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sergenian's Floor Coverings, Inc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crystal Farms 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mondi Akrosil 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE US WI Menomonee Falls Plant 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine FdL Campus 3,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercury Marine Fond du Lac 3,735 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ahern Fond du Lac - Corporate 1,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Agnes Hospital 1,479 FTE
NAT-TCR NGI National Constructors, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Allied Steel Corporation 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MANCON Corporate 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HFLCC02 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE McRae Industries Footwear Troy 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loudoun Sheet Metal Co. Inc. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown Bros., Inc. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yellow Springs Works 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.