Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Michigan

Flash Hub Delivery

Detroit, MI · ~48 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flash Hub Delivery runs at 194% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade D.

Flash Hub Delivery: 12.6 TCR = 194% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flash Hub Delivery safety composite

Flash Hub Delivery scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Flash Hub Delivery: 0.0 → 30.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 30.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.8× in 2024

Flash Hub Delivery's TCR rose 30.3 from 0.0 in 2022 to 30.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Detroit, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 12.6 · 194% of ind

  • DART 22.7 DART
  • RANK #164/202
  • PHOTO MEBAN - BANGOR
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MEBAN - BANGOR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Flash Hub Delivery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flash Hub Delivery averages 12.6 TCR (194% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flash Hub Delivery TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=30.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Flash Hub Delivery falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #164 safest of 202 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Michigan.

Flash Hub Delivery (48 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Flash Hub Delivery
Flash Hub Delivery (48 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Flash Hub Delivery has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 30.3 22.7 12 0 0
2023 7.6 7.6 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MI · Detroit

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 673 employers in Detroit, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MEBAN - BANGOR 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORNPT - NEWPORT CENTER 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR VIA Delivery & Logistics LLC 12.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 4640 NE 49TH AVE 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sietsema Farms 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.M. Longyear, LLC - Office & Forestry 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Lakes Packing Co 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Top Grade Aggregates, LLC 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Hospital 8,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit Campus 8,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - DTW 6,640 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Corporation 5,241 FTE
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 222 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Costa Solutions - Valvoline 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Titus - Cleveland 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Meban - Bangor 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 24Seven Express INC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fever Basketball LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Celeste Industries Corporation 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haven at North Hills 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.