Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors · California

Flash Plastering, Inc.

Corona, CA · ~104 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flash Plastering, Inc. runs at 470% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Flash Plastering, Inc.: 13.2 TCR = 470% of Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flash Plastering, Inc. safety composite

Flash Plastering, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Flash Plastering, Inc.: 12.9 → 16.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 23.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2024

Flash Plastering, Inc.'s TCR rose 3.2 from 12.9 in 2018 to 16.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238310 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 470% of ind

  • DART 13.8 DART
  • RANK #220/228
  • PHOTO Ashford Gypsum Servi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ashford Gypsum Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Flash Plastering, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flash Plastering, Inc. averages 13.2 TCR (470% of the Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flash Plastering, Inc. TCR series: 2018=12.9 · 2019=10.7 · 2022=23.7 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=16 · BLS 2.8

Where Flash Plastering, Inc. falls in its industry

1,613 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #220 safest of 228 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, employers in California.

Flash Plastering, Inc. (104 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flash Plastering, Inc.
Flash Plastering, Inc. (104 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Flash Plastering, Inc. has more employees than the Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) con median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.0 13.8 6 1 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 23.7 19.0 20 0 0
2019 10.7 10.7 13 0 0
2018 12.9 10.9 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238310 · CA · Corona

1,613 Plastering (i.e., ornamental, plain) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ashford Gypsum Services, Inc. 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arctic Express Insulation #680 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardoza Construction, LLC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Residential Commercial Insulation, LLC 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE farm management inc 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendall Farms LP 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Dairy L.P 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veg-Land, Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Fimbel Paunet Corp. 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Center East 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR McChesney Ave - Brunswick 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkchester South Condominium 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Landmark Nursing and Rehab 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Asphalt, Inc. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cota & Cota INC 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piqua Operations 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.