Janitorial services · Texas

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush

Houston, TX · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade B.

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush: 2.6 TCR = 57% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush safety composite

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2018

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush injury rate improved

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush's TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #182/417
  • PHOTO PGD, LLC dba Hoodz o…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PGD, LLC dba Hoodz of Nashville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush averages 2.6 TCR (57% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #182 safest of 417 Janitorial services employers in Texas.

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush
Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush (23 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Florida Cleaning Systems dba FCS Facility Svcs - Bush has fewer employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.1 5.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Houston

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PGD, LLC dba Hoodz of Nashville 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christus St. Patrick Hospital - EVS 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBM Systems 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR QSI Fort Smith Plant 2 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR First Choice Medical Staffing 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston Health Care For The Homeless Program JYP 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Buick GMC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn Carol Stream 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSTK Philadelphia 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE PnP Tallahassee 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE ModRoto, La Mirada, CA 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.