Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors · Florida

Florida Erection Service, Inc

Deerfield Beach, FL · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Florida Erection Service, Inc runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Florida Erection Service, Inc: 1.8 TCR = 66% of Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Florida Erection Service, Inc safety composite

Florida Erection Service, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.2

2018→2024

Florida Erection Service, Inc injury rate improved

Florida Erection Service, Inc's TCR fell 9.2 from 9.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.2 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Deerfield Beach, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/36
  • PHOTO Seaside Steel, INC.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seaside Steel, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Florida Erection Service, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Florida Erection Service, Inc averages 1.8 TCR (66% of the Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Florida Erection Service, Inc TCR series: 2018=9.2 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Florida Erection Service, Inc falls in its industry

705 Structural steel erecting or i establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 36 Structural steel erecting or i employers in Florida.

Florida Erection Service, Inc (43 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Florida Erection Service, Inc
Florida Erection Service, Inc (43 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Florida Erection Service, Inc has fewer employees than the Structural steel erecting or iron work c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.2 9.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · FL · Deerfield Beach

705 Structural steel erecting or iron work contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 119 employers in Deerfield Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seaside Steel, INC. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.S. Duggins Welding Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR AF Steel Fabricators LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van Buskirk Steel LLC 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE PINTO'S FARM 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fernlea Nurseries - STU 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRP Boca Raton Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stuart Office 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deerfield Beach 2,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Program 014 - Broward 1,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deerfield Distribution 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Property Management 914 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Disney Land Cafe Bungalow Gril 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Medstar Washington Hospital 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Bartlesville School District 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR American Woodmark Coorporation, Kingman AZ Plant 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brilex Industries, Inc P2 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE RMA Visalia Rd Yd 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thornton Heating 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE CON002 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.