Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing · Ohio

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant

Cleveland, OH · ~72 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant safety composite

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant: 4.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2019

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant's TCR rose 2.7 from 4.0 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325998 · Cleveland, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #35/45
  • PHOTO Custom Processing Se…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Custom Processing Services Reading, PA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant falls in its industry

485 Rubber processing preparations establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 45 Rubber processing preparations employers in Ohio.

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant (72 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant
Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant (72 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Flow Polymers Coit Road Plant has more employees than the Rubber processing preparations (e.g., ac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.7 4.0 5 0 0
2018 2.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2016 4.0 2.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325998 · OH · Cleveland

485 Rubber processing preparations (e.g., accelerators, stabilizers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 922 employers in Cleveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Custom Processing Services Reading, PA 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECD 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORG Chem Group, LLC Evansville 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vibrantz Energy - WAL 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 300A 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simonson Construction Services, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE GB Fabrication 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danbert, Inc. 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Clinic Main Campus 25,629 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Cleveland Clinic Foundation 20,763 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland Medical Center 10,377 FTE
CITY-NEAR SILCO FIRE & SECURITY - CLEVELAND 3,641 FTE
NAT-TCR TNI - Lebanon, MO 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Frattallone's Ace Hardware-White Bear Lake 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops 22 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Peter J. Caruso & Sons, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Emmi Roth USA- Monroe Plant 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 26-Colgate 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE RJ Thomas Mfg. Co., Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innocor Foam Technologies Brenham, LLC - Brenham 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.