Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Georgia

Fly & Form Structures, Inc.

Atlanta, GA · ~467 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Fly & Form Structures, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 48% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. safety composite

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2022

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. injury rate improved

Fly & Form Structures, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.1 from 1.9 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #5/32
  • PHOTO RC Structures
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~467 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RC Structures (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fly & Form Structures, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (48% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Fly & Form Structures, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 32 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Georgia.

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. (467 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fly & Form Structures, Inc.
Fly & Form Structures, Inc. (467 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Fly & Form Structures, Inc. has more employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2021 1.1 0.7 3 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 4 0 0
2019 1.7 1.1 11 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 9 0 0
2016 1.9 1.7 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · GA · Atlanta

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RC Structures 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brennstuhl Construction, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glenco Contracting Group Inc 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Florida Concrete Services, LLC 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hostess Brands Columbus 466 FTE
STATE-SIZE SSC Store Support Center 466 FTE
STATE-SIZE Augusta, GA 465 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Electric Company Inc. 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Social Vocational Services #126 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrah's Cherokee Valley River Casino and Hotel 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR RMA GeoScience, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Materials - Pueblo 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MSPCA-Angell 467 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Arc Eastern Connecticut 467 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Bennettsville SC Oak River North 467 FTE
NAT-SIZE Infinera - CA 467 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.