Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · California

Flying Squirrel Delivery

San Anselmo, CA · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flying Squirrel Delivery runs at 578% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

Flying Squirrel Delivery: 26.0 TCR = 578% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flying Squirrel Delivery safety composite

Flying Squirrel Delivery scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 35.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.7

2022→2024

Flying Squirrel Delivery injury rate improved

Flying Squirrel Delivery's TCR fell 17.7 from 53.3 in 2022 to 35.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 53.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=53.3 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=35.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · San Anselmo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.0 · 578% of ind

  • DART 35.6 DART
  • RANK #150/168
  • PHOTO 6458-ZEVR
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZEVR (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Flying Squirrel Delivery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flying Squirrel Delivery averages 26.0 TCR (578% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flying Squirrel Delivery TCR series: 2022=53.3 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=35.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Flying Squirrel Delivery falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 168 Delivery service (except as pa employers in California.

Flying Squirrel Delivery (54 employees, TCR 26.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Flying Squirrel Delivery
Flying Squirrel Delivery (54 employees, TCR 26.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Flying Squirrel Delivery has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 35.6 35.6 13 0 0
2023 16.4 16.4 6 0 0
2022 53.3 53.3 9 15 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · CA · San Anselmo

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 11 employers in San Anselmo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZEVR 26.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holm Delivery Inc 25.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Troxel Logistics, LLC 26.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6711 Belvedere Rd, West Palm Beach, FL.33413 25.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sea Mist Farms 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold E. Robben, Jr. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jose Maria Perez 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pauma Valley 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Play-Well TEKnologies Home Office 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01723 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0025-0025-01723 FAC-01723-SAN ANSELMO-CA 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY 0025 1723 78 FTE
NAT-TCR Benedictine Living Community - St. Peter 26.0 TCR
NAT-TCR QNT - Phoenix 26.0 TCR
NAT-TCR North Pacific Fishing LLC 26.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Club BOS 26.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sleepy Hollow Elementary School 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spring Arbor Coatings LLC - Spring Arbor 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haviland Drainage Products 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Signode Industrial Group Danville 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.