Laminating purchased textiles · Tennessee

Foam Products Corp.

Erwin, TN · ~57 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Foam Products Corp. runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Laminating purchased textiles workplace, earning a grade F.

Foam Products Corp.: 8.1 TCR = 244% of Laminating purchased textiles BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Foam Products Corp. safety composite

Foam Products Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.1

2016→2022

Foam Products Corp. injury rate improved

Foam Products Corp.'s TCR fell 16.1 from 20.4 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.4 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313320 · Erwin, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 244% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO SignResource Identit…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SignResource Identity Group (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Foam Products Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Foam Products Corp. averages 8.1 TCR (244% of the Laminating purchased textiles BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Foam Products Corp. TCR series: 2016=20.4 · 2017=9.1 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Foam Products Corp. falls in its industry

79 Laminating purchased textiles establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Laminating purchased textiles employers in Tennessee.

Foam Products Corp. (57 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Foam Products Corp.
Foam Products Corp. (57 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Foam Products Corp. has fewer employees than the Laminating purchased textiles median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2021 10.4 6.9 6 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.3 1.4 5 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2017 9.1 0.0 5 1 0
2016 20.4 0.0 9 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313320 · TN · Erwin

79 Laminating purchased textiles employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 24 employers in Erwin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SignResource Identity Group 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Worthen Industries Clinton 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Polymers & Chemicals INC 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABC Industries Inc. 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Middle TN Electric Membership Corporation (Downtown) 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Christman Company - Knoxville, TN 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Asphalt Paving Main Office 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concrete Polishing Technologies, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR TN-Tennessee, LLC. 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR TN Tennessee, LLC 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erwin Health Care Center 135 FTE
NAT-TCR HCA Houston Healthcare North Cypress 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100722 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR G&G Steel Iuka 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikrete - Las 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 8008 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Structural Modulars, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Memorial Rehab & Healthcare Center 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Downtown IMPACT 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.