Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing · Alabama

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls

Rainbow City, AL · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls: 7.0 TCR = 212% of Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls safety composite

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls: 11.1 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls's TCR rose 1.9 from 11.1 in 2019 to 13.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333511 · Rainbow City, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 212% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Supreme Cores Holdin…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Supreme Cores Holdings, LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls averages 7.0 TCR (212% of the Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls TCR series: 2019=11.1 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=13 · BLS 3.3

Where Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls falls in its industry

216 Molds for forming materials (e establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Molds for forming materials (e employers in Alabama.

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls (21 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls
Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls (21 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Fof King Machine of Alabama Lls has fewer employees than the Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.0 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 11.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333511 · AL · Rainbow City

216 Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 18 employers in Rainbow City, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Supreme Cores Holdings, LLC. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mack Tool 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vincent Tool Technologies Corp 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZBN KING MACHINE OF NORTH CAROLINA 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Breeder/Broilers Techs 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE IndusTREE Timber, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Gin Company Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Koch Foods Gadsden Live Haul 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Choice Fabricators 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1476 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honda Transportation 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3646 Honda Transportation 86 FTE
NAT-TCR INX International Ink Co. (3500) 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Olam Spices Hanford 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips Angelica Forest Products LLC 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oracaz-Inc-Oracle,Az - Arizona 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brain and Spine Institute 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE FSIoffice - Columbia 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Com-Tech Mechanical, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murfreesboro 885 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.