Chromatographic instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing · California

Folsom - Blue Ravine

Folsom, CA · ~207 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Folsom - Blue Ravine runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chromatographic instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Folsom - Blue Ravine: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Chromatographic instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Folsom - Blue Ravine safety composite

Folsom - Blue Ravine scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

Folsom - Blue Ravine injury rate improved

Folsom - Blue Ravine's TCR fell 3.6 from 4.8 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Folsom, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #47/51
  • PHOTO Applied Test Systems
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~207 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applied Test Systems (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Folsom - Blue Ravine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Folsom - Blue Ravine averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Chromatographic instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Folsom - Blue Ravine TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=10.9 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Folsom - Blue Ravine falls in its industry

213 Chromatographic instruments, l establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 51 Chromatographic instruments, l employers in California.

Folsom - Blue Ravine (207 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Folsom - Blue Ravine
Folsom - Blue Ravine (207 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Folsom - Blue Ravine has more employees than the Chromatographic instruments, laboratory- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.8 1 2 0
2023 2.3 1.6 6 0 0
2022 10.9 3.6 3 0 0
2021 1.9 0.9 4 0 0
2020 3.6 2.9 3 2 0
2019 2.3 1.2 4 0 0
2018 4.9 3.2 7 2 0
2017 4.8 4.2 4 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · CA · Folsom

213 Chromatographic instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 103 employers in Folsom, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applied Test Systems 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waters Corporation Nixa, MO 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Janis Research Company, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American ULT Cryogenics 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Touchstone Pistachio, Co. 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Ontario S/C 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 207 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veteran Pipeline Construction 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Folsom Campus 6,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mountain F. Enterprises, Inc. 1,009 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030162 813 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Folsom 735 FTE
NAT-TCR Park Rapids Clinic 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S03327 - Phoenix Hauling South 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Aberdeen Road Company 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR National Plastek, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Intek Plastics, Inc. Hastings 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Earle Asphalt Company 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ball Beverage Pkg 152 Williamsburg 207 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Academy School Dist 20 207 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.