Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation · Michigan

Fontanesi and Kann

Ferndale, MI · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fontanesi and Kann runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Fontanesi and Kann: 0.6 TCR = 21% of Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fontanesi and Kann safety composite

Fontanesi and Kann scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fontanesi and Kann: 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2024

Fontanesi and Kann's TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 1.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Ferndale, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 21% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #10/133
  • PHOTO Scott Electric Company
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Scott Electric Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fontanesi and Kann in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fontanesi and Kann averages 0.6 TCR (21% of the Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fontanesi and Kann TCR series: 2019=0 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Fontanesi and Kann falls in its industry

4,550 Control system (e.g., environm establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 133 Control system (e.g., environm employers in Michigan.

Fontanesi and Kann (79 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fontanesi and Kann
Fontanesi and Kann (79 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Fontanesi and Kann has more employees than the Control system (e.g., environmental, hum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · MI · Ferndale

4,550 Control system (e.g., environmental, humidity, temperature) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 28 employers in Ferndale, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Scott Electric Company 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rabalais Constructors, LLC. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICS integrated Communication Systems 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LKC-Farmingdale 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Van Dyken Mechanical 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grapids Home Services 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sharon's Heating & Air Conditioning 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albion Dry Ice Plant 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garden Fresh Gourmet 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Kingswood Hospital 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingswood Hospital 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR Progressive Mechanical, Inc 212 FTE
NAT-TCR Prasco 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Contracting 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Spark Therapy, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri Pointe Homes San Diego 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 133 Boynton Beach 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Pointe Nursing and Rehab 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilmer Nursing and Rehabilitation 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altercare Transitional Care of the Western Reserve 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.