Employer · California
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF
Red Bluff, CA · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF: 4.2 TCR = 126% of industry BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF safety composite
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
50/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 4.17 per 100 workers
Safer than 22% of industry peers
- DART rate
- B 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 83% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−8.3
2017→2018
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF injury rate improved
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF's TCR fell 8.3 from 8.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=8.3 · 2018=0.0
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 322211 · Red Bluff, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 126% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK #83/111
- PHOTO U.S. Display Group -…
- BOOK 2y book
- INJ 3 inj
- SIZE ~67 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: U.S. Display Group - California (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF
4.2 TCR
- U.S. Display G
U.S. Display Group - California
4.2 TCR
- Forest Packagi
Forest Packaging Corp.
4.2 TCR
- York Container
York Container Company
4.2 TCR
- NewCorr Packag
NewCorr Packaging, LP
4.2 TCR
What this shows Food Packaging : RED BLUFF averages 4.2 TCR (126% of the industry BLS benchmark).
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3
Where Food Packaging : RED BLUFF falls in its industry
1,338 industry establishmentsSafer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 111 industry employers in California.
Food Packaging : RED BLUFF has fewer employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 8.3 | 2.8 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
322211 · CA · Red Bluff
1,338 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 53 employers in Red Bluff, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | U.S. Display Group - California | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Forest Packaging Corp. | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | York Container Company | 4.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | NewCorr Packaging, LP | 4.2 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Sonoma GVIC Ranches | 67 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP | 67 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Travaille and Phippen, Inc. | 67 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Nurseries | 67 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | 6026 | 996 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | WM 6026 | 842 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | County of Tehama | 787 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | California Department of Transportation Facility 27 | 570 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Denver Brick Plant | 4.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Columbus Oh - Eww (Ohcbs) | 4.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Bemidji (Mnbem) | 4.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Rome (Garom) | 4.2 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Elkins (Wvelk) | 67 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Elma Center (Waelm) | 67 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | St. Johnsbury (Vtsjo) | 67 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Livingston Healthcare Service Tn (Tnmeh) | 67 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.