Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services · Nebraska

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab

Omaha, NE · ~46 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services workplace, earning a grade D.

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab: 0.7 TCR = 132% of Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab safety composite

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab held a steady TCR band

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Omaha, NE ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 0.7 · 132% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P66
  • PHOTO Chelsea Proving Grou…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chelsea Proving Grounds (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab averages 0.7 TCR (132% of the Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab falls in its industry

232 Laboratory testing (except med establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab (46 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab (46 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Omaha Lab has fewer employees than the Laboratory testing (except medical, vete median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · NE · Omaha

232 Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chelsea Proving Grounds 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bloomington - BIC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AMERICAS 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tulsa FS (O&G) - 1777 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Maschhoffs, LLC - Columbus Office 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lyman-Richey Sand & Gravel - Shop 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4358 - 1-MAIN 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE J-Tech Construction 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Greers Electric, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CFE Rock Valley 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maitland, FL Regional Office - pms96100 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacobs - NORTH MIAMI BEACH - OMI 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RIU - Residence Inn Uptown 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Department of Corrections - Lahser District Probation 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Erosion Control 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE STA-Southside (DYL-341) 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.