Fresh fruits, vegetables and berries merchant wholesalers · Washington

Food Service Slicing, LLC

Cashmere, WA · ~91 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Food Service Slicing, LLC runs at 459% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fresh fruits, vegetables and berries merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Food Service Slicing, LLC: 10.1 TCR = 459% of Fresh fruits, vegetables and berries merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Food Service Slicing, LLC safety composite

Food Service Slicing, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.7

2019→2024

Food Service Slicing, LLC injury rate improved

Food Service Slicing, LLC's TCR fell 22.7 from 27.7 in 2019 to 5.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=27.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424480 · Cashmere, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 459% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #10/18
  • PHOTO J. Ambrogi Foods
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J. Ambrogi Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Food Service Slicing, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Food Service Slicing, LLC averages 10.1 TCR (459% of the Fresh fruits, vegetables and berries merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Food Service Slicing, LLC TCR series: 2019=27.7 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=5 · BLS 2.2

Where Food Service Slicing, LLC falls in its industry

369 Fresh fruits, vegetables and b establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 18 Fresh fruits, vegetables and b employers in Washington.

Food Service Slicing, LLC (91 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Food Service Slicing, LLC
Food Service Slicing, LLC (91 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Food Service Slicing, LLC has more employees than the Fresh fruits, vegetables and berries mer median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 5.0 5 0 0
2023 4.7 3.5 3 1 0
2022 4.9 4.9 5 0 0
2021 8.4 7.2 7 0 0
2020 9.9 5.7 6 1 0
2019 27.7 27.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424480 · WA · Cashmere

369 Fresh fruits, vegetables and berries merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 7 employers in Cashmere, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J. Ambrogi Foods 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NANCO Distribution Company 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanwa International Wholesale Foods, LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Get Fresh Sales, Inc 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE MWR RIVERSIDE ORCHARDS LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Maintenance (Location) 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE T Diamond Bar LLC 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRUNCH PAK, LLC 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Star Growers 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cashmere Post Acute 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cashmere Care Center 66 FTE
NAT-TCR Kent Nutrition Group- Arcade 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR J. Ambrogi Foods 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NVL024 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yellow Medicine East Independent School District 2190 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE St Paul 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Clara City Care Center 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Brand, Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE EH Baare Corp 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.