Construction management, water and sewer line · South Carolina

Foremost Pipeline, Inc.

Gaston, SC · ~210 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, water and sewer line workplace, earning a grade A.

Foremost Pipeline, Inc.: 1.1 TCR = 39% of Construction management, water and sewer line BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. safety composite

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2024

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. injury rate improved

Foremost Pipeline, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.0 from 2.4 in 2017 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Gaston, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #7/21
  • PHOTO Baker Main Office
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~210 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baker Main Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Foremost Pipeline, Inc. averages 1.1 TCR (39% of the Construction management, water and sewer line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Foremost Pipeline, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Construction management, water establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 21 Construction management, water employers in South Carolina.

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. (210 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Foremost Pipeline, Inc.
Foremost Pipeline, Inc. (210 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Foremost Pipeline, Inc. has more employees than the Construction management, water and sewer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2023 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2022 1.7 0.9 4 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 1.4 1.0 3 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.4 1.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · SC · Gaston

1,614 Construction management, water and sewer line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 32 employers in Gaston, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baker Main Office 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis Contracting Services LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blakley Construction Services 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gulf Stream Construction Company, Inc. 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cushman Plant 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Offices 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADSON SC 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAIRWAY FORD INC 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Private Residence Gaston SC 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alpek Polyester USA, LLC-Columbia Site 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR DAK Americas, LLC-Columbia Site 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stier Supply Co. 286 FTE
NAT-TCR Longley Brothers Dodge 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 8100 Debone Koch Foods of AL 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Waubonsee Community College 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR H&R Mfg and Supply Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gavin Power, LLC 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graco Inc. - Anoka 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE SA Recycling, Corporate 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE USG Interiors Greenville 210 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.