Writing paper and envelopes, boxed sets, made from purchased paper · Illinois

Forest Envelope

Bolingbrook, IL · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forest Envelope runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Writing paper and envelopes, boxed sets, made from purchased paper workplace, earning a grade C.

Forest Envelope: 3.9 TCR = 119% of Writing paper and envelopes, boxed sets, made from purchased paper BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forest Envelope safety composite

Forest Envelope scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2023

Forest Envelope injury rate improved

Forest Envelope's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322230 · Bolingbrook, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 119% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO NATIONAL CHECKING CO…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NATIONAL CHECKING CO. - LOTHENBACH (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Forest Envelope in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forest Envelope averages 3.9 TCR (119% of the Writing paper and envelopes, boxed sets, made from purchased paper BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forest Envelope TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=7.9 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=8.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Forest Envelope falls in its industry

122 Writing paper and envelopes, b establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Writing paper and envelopes, b employers in Illinois.

Forest Envelope (44 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Forest Envelope
Forest Envelope (44 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Forest Envelope has fewer employees than the Writing paper and envelopes, boxed sets, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 8.5 0.0 4 0 0
2018 6.1 0.0 3 0 0
2017 7.9 2.0 4 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322230 · IL · Bolingbrook

122 Writing paper and envelopes, boxed sets, made from purchased paper employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 243 employers in Bolingbrook, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NATIONAL CHECKING CO. - LOTHENBACH 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 09 - MKS 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 01 - KC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plant 06 - FW 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Main Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2570-Thomasboro, IL (Monsanto Co.) 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eastern Illini Electric Cooperative Paxton Headquarters 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eastern Illini Elec. Coop. Paxton Heaquarters 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR IL-02 4,926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 1,368 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4818-48180018-300 E. CROSSROADS PKWY-WC 971 FTE
CITY-NEAR G&W Electric Company 935 FTE
NAT-TCR Ouachita Brick Plant 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tyler, Tx #00502 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Astoria Health & Rehab 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR STL St. Louis Lambert International Airport 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nashville - ProCare 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanchez Professional Cleaning Services LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saratoga Star Aquatics LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE NHB 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.