Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Kentucky

Forest Hills Commens

Lousville, KY · ~64 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forest Hills Commens runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Forest Hills Commens: 6.7 TCR = 176% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forest Hills Commens safety composite

Forest Hills Commens scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Forest Hills Commens: 0.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 12.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2021

Forest Hills Commens's TCR rose 4.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lousville, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.7 · 176% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #36/64
  • PHOTO Vintage Park of Hiaw…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vintage Park of Hiawatha (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Forest Hills Commens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forest Hills Commens averages 6.7 TCR (176% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forest Hills Commens TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=12.2 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Forest Hills Commens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Forest Hills Commens (64 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Forest Hills Commens
Forest Hills Commens (64 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Forest Hills Commens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2020 12.2 0.0 7 0 0
2019 10.5 3.5 6 0 0
2018 10.9 9.1 6 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · KY · Lousville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 3 employers in Lousville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vintage Park of Hiawatha 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cove at Marsh Landing 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cottages at The Glen 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Levis Commons 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kentucky Hatchery (CV) 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE INTER-COUNTY ENERGY COOPERATIVE 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Service Center 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scott, Murphy and Daniel 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ole Mexican Foods, Lousville 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON FARMS- KY 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Destination Residences Snowmass 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10300) 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LMI - STC - Hwy 94 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Las Vegas TJ Maxx Distribution Center 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robin A. Crawford & Son Woods 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fagerdala/Sealed Air-Indianna 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Supply and Service, LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Masco Coatings Group Roanoke Distribution 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.