Semiconductor devices manufacturing · California

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA

Livermore, CA · ~633 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Semiconductor devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA safety composite

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2022

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA injury rate improved

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.1 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #103/128
  • PHOTO MKS Santa Clara
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 52 inj
  • SIZE ~633 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MKS Santa Clara (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=2 · BLS 3.3

Where FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA falls in its industry

437 Semiconductor devices manufact establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 128 Semiconductor devices manufact employers in California.

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA (633 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA
FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA (633 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

FormFactor Inc. Livermore, CA has more employees than the Semiconductor devices manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.0 1.9 3 14 0
2021 1.4 1.3 11 0 0
2020 2.2 1.9 15 0 0
2019 1.6 1.6 8 0 0
2018 1.7 1.4 7 1 0
2017 3.1 1.7 8 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · CA · Livermore

437 Semiconductor devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MKS Santa Clara 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Skyworks Solutions, Inc. - Basking Ridge, NJ 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mattson Technology, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Axsun Technologies 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Orchard Development Inc 633 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paragon Framing Inc 634 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific Pleasanton Sunol Facility 634 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aerospace : Irvine MFCD 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Comfort Systems USA (Arkansas) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Titan Corrugated 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Enterprise Holdings - AVL Airport 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Centura Lab 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Horace Mann Educational Associates 633 FTE
NAT-SIZE WP Beverages, LLC 633 FTE
NAT-SIZE 396139-Oklahoma City Ok P&Dc 633 FTE
NAT-SIZE Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault 633 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.