Chicken egg production · Minnesota

Forsman Farms SH

Cokato, MN · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forsman Farms SH runs at 434% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Chicken egg production workplace, earning a grade F.

Forsman Farms SH: 19.6 TCR = 434% of Chicken egg production BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forsman Farms SH safety composite

Forsman Farms SH scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Forsman Farms SH: 13.2 → 21.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 24.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2020

Forsman Farms SH's TCR rose 8.3 from 13.2 in 2018 to 21.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 24.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112310 · Cokato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.6 · 434% of ind

  • DART 18.8 DART
  • RANK #10/10
  • PHOTO GP Production (Misso…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GP Production (Missouri) (0.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Forsman Farms SH in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forsman Farms SH averages 19.6 TCR (434% of the Chicken egg production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forsman Farms SH TCR series: 2018=13.2 · 2019=24 · 2020=21.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Forsman Farms SH falls in its industry

351 Chicken egg production establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 10 Chicken egg production employers in Minnesota.

Forsman Farms SH (34 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Forsman Farms SH
Forsman Farms SH (34 employees, TCR 19.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Forsman Farms SH has fewer employees than the Chicken egg production median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 21.5 18.8 8 0 0
2019 24.0 24.0 8 0 0
2018 13.2 13.2 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112310 · MN · Cokato

351 Chicken egg production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 14 employers in Cokato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GP Production (Missouri) 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR VALO BioMedia NA, LLC. Maryland 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quincy, FL Complex (same location as ID 113251) 20.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canon Pullet 17.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE KBQ, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daybreak Foods, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klaphake Feed Mill Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melrose Live Haul 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cokato Charitable Trust 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance Process Tech inc 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cokato 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dassel-Cokato ISD #466 92 FTE
NAT-TCR Retama Nursing Center/Jourdanton 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZNST 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 2 19.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ware Butler Building Supply - Madison Main 19.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE TENMET 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preyde One, LLC. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bakery Nouveau - Capital Hill 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dutch Creek Foods 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.