Food Service Contractors · North Carolina

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road

Fayetteville, NC · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Food Service Contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Food Service Contractors BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road safety composite

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road held a steady TCR band

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.0 TCR.

2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Fayetteville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/214
  • PHOTO Barclay's Whippany
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barclay's Whippany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Food Service Contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road falls in its industry

6,952 Food Service Contractors establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 214 Food Service Contractors employers in North Carolina.

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road
Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road (30 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Fort Bragg Food Svs Building A-3556 Butner Road has fewer employees than the Food Service Contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · NC · Fayetteville

6,952 Food Service Contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 317 employers in Fayetteville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barclay's Whippany 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOREHOUSE COLLEGE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BLOOMBERG 731 LEX PANTRY 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT GRAMBLING RESIDENT DINING 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brookdale Lenoir Assisted Living 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4769-723-WILLIAMS SONOMA 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Landings of Smithfield 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fayetteville-Morgan, NC-Biolife 784 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cape Fear Valley Health System/Cumberland County 5,925 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company - Fayetteville 2,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Cumberland 2,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear Fayetteville 2,044 FTE
NAT-TCR Other Location 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gaapr - Ups Supply Chain Solutions 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Putzel Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn East Rutherford 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springhill Suites Louisville Airport 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Craftweld Fabrication Co. Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocean State Power 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.