Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · West Virginia

Fort Martin

Maidsville, WV · ~176 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Martin runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade C.

Fort Martin: 1.1 TCR = 93% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Martin safety composite

Fort Martin scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Martin: 0.6 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.51× in 2024

Fort Martin's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Maidsville, WV AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO PMR Plant Martin
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PMR Plant Martin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · West Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Fort Martin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Martin averages 1.1 TCR (93% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Martin TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Fort Martin falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to West Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in West Virginia.

Fort Martin (176 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Martin
Fort Martin (176 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Fort Martin has more employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2023 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2022 1.7 1.1 3 0 0
2021 1.2 1.2 1 1 0
2020 3.2 2.6 2 4 0
2019 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · WV · Maidsville

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,269 rated employers in West Virginia with headcount on file · 5 employers in Maidsville, WV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PMR Plant Martin 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. Sam Rayburn Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawrenceburg Power, LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Chemours Company FC, LLC - Belle 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ply-Gem Variform 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Variform Inc. dba Ply Gem Siding Group 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crestview THS LLC 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR MPW Environmental Services, Inc. - First Energy Fort Martin 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ridge Runner PLS LLC 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR CEC Steel 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR BrandSafway Industries LLC - Fort Martin Power Station-WV 20 FTE
NAT-TCR AXIOS Riverview (Mosaic) 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hardin Memorial Hospital 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PMR Plant Martin 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Valdosta Cottonseed 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE MacArthur Company - Energy Panel Structures IA 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fruita Jobsites 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE UNFI Distribution Company, LLC (Fort Wayne) 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE McHenry, IL - Pallet Plant - 337 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.