Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing · Ohio

Fort Recovery Industries

Fort Recovery, OH · ~240 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Recovery Industries runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Fort Recovery Industries: 7.1 TCR = 215% of Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Recovery Industries safety composite

Fort Recovery Industries scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.9

2016→2023

Fort Recovery Industries injury rate improved

Fort Recovery Industries's TCR fell 6.9 from 9.2 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.2 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=9.0 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331523 · Fort Recovery, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 215% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #16/21
  • PHOTO Twin City Die Castin…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 113 inj
  • SIZE ~240 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twin City Die Castings Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Fort Recovery Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Recovery Industries averages 7.1 TCR (215% of the Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Recovery Industries TCR series: 2016=9.2 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=9 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Fort Recovery Industries falls in its industry

221 Aluminum die-castings, unfinis establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 21 Aluminum die-castings, unfinis employers in Ohio.

Fort Recovery Industries (240 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Recovery Industries
Fort Recovery Industries (240 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Fort Recovery Industries has more employees than the Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 2.3 3 1 0
2022 9.0 5.6 16 0 0
2021 9.8 6.1 21 0 0
2020 5.2 3.6 9 1 0
2019 7.4 4.9 14 1 0
2018 6.6 4.4 13 2 0
2017 7.3 4.5 16 2 0
2016 9.2 5.2 21 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331523 · OH · Fort Recovery

221 Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 18 employers in Fort Recovery, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Twin City Die Castings Company 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miniature Casting Corp 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Madison-Kipp Corporation (Sun Prairie) 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ambrit Industries Inc 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ineos Pigments, Plant 1 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Xaloy, LLC 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boxout, LLC 240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Equipment Co Inc. 240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cheeseman LLC 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turkey Service Building 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR J & M Manufacturing Co., Inc. 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Assembly/Packing Plant and Distribution Center 118 FTE
NAT-TCR El Dorado Surgery Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Protein Solutions 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4122 VISALIA, CA 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Five Star Supermarket of Norwich, Inc. 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Power Products - Menomonee Falls 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE BNR South Jersey 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester Meat Company 240 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Lithographing Corporation 240 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.