Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation · Alabama

Fort Rucker Commissary

Name: Fort Rucker Commissary Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Enterprise, AL · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 7.2
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Rucker Commissary runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation workplace, earning a grade D.

Fort Rucker Commissary: 7.2 TCR = 190% of Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Rucker Commissary safety composite

Fort Rucker Commissary scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 7.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers
DART rate: F 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Rucker Commissary: 0.0 → 14.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 14.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2017

Fort Rucker Commissary's TCR rose 14.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 14.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Enterprise, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 190% of ind

DART 4.8 DART
RANK #6/7
PHOTO CREIGHTON
BOOK 2y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CREIGHTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

7240 Alexandri

7.3
This site

7.2
CREIGHTON

7.2
Macedon

7.2
SC Voc Rehab C

7.2

What this shows Fort Rucker Commissary averages 7.2 TCR (190% of the Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation BLS benchmark).

Fort Rucker Commissary TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=14.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Fort Rucker Commissary falls in its industry

1,455 Job training, vocational rehab establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Job training, vocational rehab employers in Alabama.

Fort Rucker Commissary (29 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Fort Rucker Commissary has fewer employees than the Job training, vocational rehabilitation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	14.4	4.8	3	0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · AL · Enterprise

1,455 Job training, vocational rehabilitation or habilitation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 40 employers in Enterprise, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	CREIGHTON	MALONE, NY	7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Macedon	ROCHESTER, NY	7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	SC Voc Rehab Conway	CONWAY, SC	7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	7240 Alexandria Prince St	ALEXANDRIA, VA	7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Grand Bay	GRAND BAY	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Mid Star Wood Haulers	TOXEY	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Oak Grove - APC	SYLACAUGA	29 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Gardendale Crew Headquarters - APC	GARDENDALE	29 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Pilgrims	Enterprise	656 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 734	Enterprise	382 FTE
CITY-NEAR	734	Enterprise	378 FTE
CITY-NEAR	RWFT US AL Ft Rucker AL AL985	Enterprise	370 FTE
NAT-TCR	Midwest Scrap Management KC	Kansas City, MO	7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Rai Crew Mia	Miami, FL	7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	0426 - New Braunfels, Tx	New Braunfels, TX	7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	1730 LKQ/Keystone	Phoenix, AZ	7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	0109 - Norfolk, Va	Norfolk, VA	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0097 - Raleigh, Nc	Raleigh, NC	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	0016 - Modesto, Ca	Modesto, CA	29 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Mid-West Roofing Company	Mason City, IA	29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.