Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance · Louisiana

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel

St. Gabriel, LA · ~145 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance workplace, earning a grade D.

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel: 6.0 TCR = 134% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel safety composite

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel: 1.9 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.84× in 2020

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel's TCR rose 8.3 from 1.9 in 2019 to 10.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · St. Gabriel, LA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 134% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #38/43
  • PHOTO Totran USA
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Totran USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel averages 6.0 TCR (134% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2020=10.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel falls in its industry

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 43 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in Louisiana.

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel (145 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel
Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel (145 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Fort Transfer Company -St. Gabriel has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 10.2 5.1 2 0 0
2019 1.9 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · LA · St. Gabriel

1,026 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 29 employers in St. Gabriel, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Totran USA 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Proficient Auto Transport 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Terminal 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moore Transport - Curtis Bay 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - Shreveport Levy 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crosby Dredging, LLC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hi-Tech Electric - New Orleans 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Womack and Sons Construction Group LLC 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Gabriel Site 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR OIS-St. Gabriel 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEO Heat Exchangers / Field Service 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pioneer Americas LLC, St. Gabriel 114 FTE
NAT-TCR Weber Automotive Corporation 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rustbusters 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NBA 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Clara Store 17 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE ARYZTA - Ontario 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Office - 363 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pro Comp Suspension LLC Tap Manufacturing 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cady - 02 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.