Animal hospitals · Texas

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital

Fort Worth, TX · ~29 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital runs at 3112% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Animal hospitals workplace, earning a grade F.

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital: 15.6 TCR = 3112% of Animal hospitals BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital safety composite

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 15.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−50.7

2020→2023

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital injury rate improved

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital's TCR fell 50.7 from 64.0 in 2020 to 13.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 64.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=64.0 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=16.7 · 2023=13.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541940 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 3112% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/28
  • PHOTO Lakefield Veterinary…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lakefield Veterinary Group - 119 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital averages 15.6 TCR (3112% of the Animal hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital TCR series: 2020=64 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=16.7 · 2023=13.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital falls in its industry

261 Animal hospitals establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 12.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 28 Animal hospitals employers in Texas.

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital (29 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 12.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital
Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital (29 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 12.0

Fort Worth Animal Emergency Hospital has fewer employees than the Animal hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 12.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.3 0.0 4 0 0
2022 16.7 0.0 4 1 0
2021 16.7 3.3 5 0 0
2020 64.0 0.0 15 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541940 · TX · Fort Worth

261 Animal hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 119 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakefield Veterinary Group - 102 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metropolitan Veterinary Hospital - Akron 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adobe Animal Hospital 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Hereford 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pepper Dairy 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE SROOC Holding LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Logging, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Kinderhook Operating LLC 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Martin America 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Covenant Healthcare, LLC 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01711 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASRC Earthworks LLC 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE CaringEdge Healthcare of Minot 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Brewing Company Downingtown Brewery 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bin There Dump That, Tri-State 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.