Air-Conditioning and warm air heating eqp. and com · Texas

Fort Worth Core Jacket

Fort Worth, TX · ~158 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Worth Core Jacket runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air-Conditioning and warm air heating eqp. and com workplace, earning a grade B.

Fort Worth Core Jacket: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Air-Conditioning and warm air heating eqp. and com BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Worth Core Jacket safety composite

Fort Worth Core Jacket scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Worth Core Jacket: 0.7 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2019

Fort Worth Core Jacket's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.7 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #21/52
  • PHOTO International Enviro…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: International Environmental Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fort Worth Core Jacket in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Worth Core Jacket averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Air-Conditioning and warm air heating eqp. and com BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Worth Core Jacket TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Fort Worth Core Jacket falls in its industry

461 Air-Conditioning and warm air establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 52 Air-Conditioning and warm air employers in Texas.

Fort Worth Core Jacket (158 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Worth Core Jacket
Fort Worth Core Jacket (158 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Fort Worth Core Jacket has fewer employees than the Air-Conditioning and warm air heating eq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 4 0 0
2017 1.9 1.9 3 0 0
2016 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · TX · Fort Worth

461 Air-Conditioning and warm air heating eqp. and com employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR International Environmental Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Unified Brands 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transport Solutions NA and EMEA : MFG-Hastings, NE-USA 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Innovations, Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wonderful Citrus Texas Farming Operations 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crescent Directional Drilling, LP 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE GXA GEXA Energy LP Houston TX 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pharr Svc Ctr 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Jacksonville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shea Properties-CO 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GA-Mars Packaging 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 422 ABC Supply Co., inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Auburn Hills Marriott Pontiac 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laars Heating Systems Company 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Botsford Hospital - Evs 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE True Value Allentown RDC 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.