Carbon black manufacturing · Texas

Fort Worth Corporate

Fort Worth, TX · ~61 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Worth Corporate runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Carbon black manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Fort Worth Corporate: 0.8 TCR = 25% of Carbon black manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Worth Corporate safety composite

Fort Worth Corporate scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2024

Fort Worth Corporate injury rate improved

Fort Worth Corporate's TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325180 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/47
  • PHOTO Prince Erachem Inc -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prince Erachem Inc - Baltimore (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fort Worth Corporate in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Worth Corporate averages 0.8 TCR (25% of the Carbon black manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Worth Corporate TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Fort Worth Corporate falls in its industry

418 Carbon black manufacturing establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 47 Carbon black manufacturing employers in Texas.

Fort Worth Corporate (61 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Worth Corporate
Fort Worth Corporate (61 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Fort Worth Corporate has more employees than the Carbon black manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.7 2.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325180 · TX · Fort Worth

418 Carbon black manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prince Erachem Inc - Baltimore 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Battleground Plant 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PQ Corporation- Joliet 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scientific Design Company 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Muleshoe Dairy LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Drilling LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXOMA SVC CTR 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEC-Cedar Park 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Elkton, VA Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Luxium Solutions - Hiram 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin Powder Great Lakes LLC - Findlay 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor's Industrial Coatings, Incorporated - Branch 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mid South Roller Company 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alta Enterprises LLC- Kentwood 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE OFFICE 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Costello Dismantling Company, Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.