Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage · Texas

Fort Worth South Dist Center

Fort Worth, TX · ~258 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Worth South Dist Center runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Fort Worth South Dist Center: 4.7 TCR = 82% of Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Worth South Dist Center safety composite

Fort Worth South Dist Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−97.1

2020→2024

Fort Worth South Dist Center injury rate improved

Fort Worth South Dist Center's TCR fell 97.1 from 98.9 in 2020 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 98.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=98.9 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #42/71
  • PHOTO WM 6091
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~258 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WM 6091 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Fort Worth South Dist Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Worth South Dist Center averages 4.7 TCR (82% of the Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Worth South Dist Center TCR series: 2020=98.9 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Fort Worth South Dist Center falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated Warehousing and S establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 71 Refrigerated Warehousing and S employers in Texas.

Fort Worth South Dist Center (258 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Worth South Dist Center
Fort Worth South Dist Center (258 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Fort Worth South Dist Center has more employees than the Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 5 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 4 0 0
2022 5.3 4.9 8 4 0
2021 10.4 9.7 3 12 0
2020 98.9 98.9 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · TX · Fort Worth

1,039 Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WM 6091 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suiza Dairy Corporation Toa Baja 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burris Jacksonville 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 804 - Tipp City Frozen Foods 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MS Directional, LLC 258 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric Cooperative, Inc 258 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turner at Formosa Plastics Corporation Point Comfort TX 258 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bakkavor Foods USA (San Antonio) 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Sedgwick Plaza 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Crane Consumables.com 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Edison Support Center 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverview ADT 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ziegler Tire and Supply Company, Inc. 258 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essendant Cranbury OE 258 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarasota Distribution 258 FTE
NAT-SIZE VA - DuPont 258 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.